Showing posts with label God. Show all posts
Showing posts with label God. Show all posts

Sunday, 15 June 2014

The new religion is medicine and the new God is science and your priest is now your doctor......


If we do not have something to fear we will invent something to fear .....

After living for many years in quite a few Third World countries I have long been curious about the level of fear which is apparent in the developed world compared to those countries, which, because of their circumstances and nature have good reason for most to fear many things, much of the time and yet, where the Fear Factor is less.

What is it about developed nations which has them scrambling to gather together and maintain, a myriad of potential fears along with a host of imagined ones?

Is it that the archetype of Fear is and must be a part of human life, to lesser and greater degrees and when we have little to fear in any real sense, we must invent things to fear? And is it also that in a world where most have little faith and no trust in any God and little or no trust in those ‘authority’ figures of the past who could be seen as trustworthy, that we feel more vulnerable and frightened?

I am not arguing either for faith in God or faith in authority figures, in fact, quite the opposite, but merely exploring the source of such largely irrational and unnecessary fears and ultimately questioning why it is that we are drawn to fears and then to the need for some authority figure to quell those fears.

There is no doubt that ‘real’ and tangible fears are easier to deal with in some ways because they are identifiable, and we are always more comfortable with certainty, however much of an illusion it might be, than possibility.

Perhaps finding something to fear, which can be called real, whether it is or not, diminishes the fear factor because we know and can see quite clearly with what we are dealing. And if society agrees this is a real fear, we feel even more comfortable although the fear may only ever be something ‘agreed upon’ within the society which is why it exists in the first place.

So, while living in a literal war zone, or amongst severe poverty and oppression, will always bring demonstrable and real fears in ways that living in a civilized and secure nation does not and cannot - in the absence of fear, so we may feel comfortable, fears must be found.

Perhaps, without real fears and subjected to ‘free-floating anxiety’ with fear being a natural part of the human condition which kept us ‘alive’ and ‘safe’ from monsters, mastodons and marauders throughout millennia, we are therefore driven, albeit unconsciously, to invent fears in order to assuage the underlying anxiety and create an ‘illusion of certainty’ in regard to what we feel but do not understand.

And of course, when we invent fears we must then find ways to handle those fears, because to live with fear and do little or nothing, is for most intolerable. And for that we also have an innate impetus – we need to find someone or something we trust to save us.

God was very useful for this in the past because God in various forms was more powerful than we were or than mum, dad, or the king would ever be and was good at multi-tasking. God could pretty much take care of any fear, anywhere, anytime, or, at least offer the illusion that this was being done depending upon one’s ability to have faith.

The question in the modern age, in those nations which have least to fear, seems to be: Where can that fear be ‘hung’ in the first place so we can tell ourselves we know what it is we fear, and who, or what, can we summon to deal with it and save us from its threat? And there must be a ‘place’ to put our fear, whether real or imagined, and there must be someone or something who can save us, for without either, the path leads only to madness. That too being a part of human nature which we sense even if we do not know it as a literal truth.

In times past people put their faith and trust in God, priests, kings, queens, lords, leaders, politicians, teachers, lawyers, bank managers and those supposedly reliable and trustworthy bastions of society. But those days are gone and these days the ‘person’ it seems who is generally most trusted, is likely to be a medical professional, a nurse or a doctor.  And also up there will be those who are involved in the realms of keeping us safe in some way, as research into who it is, or what profession is it, that we most trust.

The evidence is that Americans are the most fearful people on the planet it seems, fearing their Government in ways that other developed nations do not, despite being the most religious of developed nations, so clearly having God around does not help much.  The Americans invented the Preppers, a group of people, numbering millions, who are so fearful of what might happen and the potential dangers they may face,  that they feel a need to dig a hole and bury themselves along with huge quantities of guns, water and baked beans!

 Although, to be fair, the religious belief in the main in the US, is invested in a God of fear and retribution so there is little comfort and more fear added to the equations. But the Fear Factor seems to be part and parcel of modern life in the developed world to lesser and greater degrees, everywhere.

Finding out the source, and/or the focus of our fears can be aided by knowing which professions are most trusted. Human nature being what it is, we are going to need to trust those whom we consider to be most useful to us.

Americans trust doctors and nurses most of all, swapping around with the number one spot. The British also trust doctors or nurses the most with teachers second and scientists third, so one and two fall into the ‘save us from death, disease and danger category.’

Australians are a bit more pragmatic with, in 2013, doctors coming sixth on the list of professions we trust and nurses at number four. However, Firefighters, Paramedics and Rescue Volunteers at one, two and three, are also connected with death, disease and danger, as are Pilots at number five-  and who would get on a plane if we did not trust them - and Pharmacists at number seven, and so equate in general with the new religion and faith in the ‘medical’ profession, or rather, those professions and systems which we believe can keep us safe and alive.

And Europeans are more akin to Australians with 1. Firefighter | 2. Nurse | 3. Pilot | 4. Pharmacist | 5. Medical Doctor, but the common factor in all is that trust is placed in those professions involved in the areas of death, disease, danger.

Given where people choose to place their trust it is not surprising that the most prevalent fears revolve around disease and death in ways which are delusional when one considers the circumstances in which most live in developed nations. Most people do not face starvation or even malnutrition and neither do they face a threat of deadly epidemics given the high levels of sanitation. If they are injured badly in an accident they have ready access to a hospital which offers surgical and trauma skills of which people in the past and still in the Third World, can only dream.

There is no denying that the greatest skills of modern medicine are in surgical and trauma! Living in the Third World requires a degree of acceptance and pragmatism where a car accident where you are injured is likely to have you transported, as I learned from experience, to a clinic some hours away where a doctor might be on hand and where the décor is largely blood-spattered concrete and the X-Ray machine, if it exists, is broken, or there is no-one around who knows how to use it.

And yet, with less certainty, and perhaps because of it, people living in such circumstances are less consumed with fear than those cossetted by First World standards and care.

We have never been better fed, living in more secure, safer and more sanitary conditions and we have never faced less threats and yet people living in the developed world seem to live with more Fear than those who still do face such real threats as famine, war, poverty and disease.

It is as if we cannot help ourselves. If we do not have something to fear we must invent something to fear. It is as if we do not have a God in some form that we fear we must invent a God that we fear. It is as if we do not have some terrible threat in the form of advancing hordes of murderous barbarians or the Black Death breathing in the gutters of our streets, that we must invent some terrible threat.

The wailing and raging and moaning and fearing now goes not into the sight of ‘fires burning on distant hilltops which signal the enemy is near,’ nor in’ pustules appearing on a neighbour’s face as rats scurry around the kitchen’ but in what we eat or do not eat, how often we exercise or do not exercise, whether we have obeyed the instructions from the health professions which we are told ‘will save us’ and had the myriad countless tests, the modern version of Christian absolution  in ages past, which means we have been good enough and have been obedient enough, to have been ‘forgiven’ for the countless sins we must surely have committed as members of this new crusade against the heathen enemies of disease and death.

It most certainly keeps many, perhaps most, distracted if not obsessed and as pious and as righteous in their faith as people have been throughout history. There is still religion, it is just a new religion. There is still God, it is just a new version of God. And there is still the most terrible fear driving it all.

Plus ca change….. or, the more things change the more they remain the same. We remain, as human beings, not much different to that which we have always been and forgetting this fact means that we will not have beliefs so much, as beliefs will have us!

And the new belief, faith and trust has been vested in science/medicine – for good and for ill.

As Olivier Clerc so insightfully articulated in his book, Modern Medicine – The New World Religion, the imagined fears are mostly fixed on health, which really means an obsession with death, and where the new God to be placated and pacified, is modern medicine in the form of your doctor!

As Clerc says:

“Medicine, then, has become the new world religion. The specific myths, beliefs and rites of Christianity have been unconsciously projected over medicine since Pasteur. As I explain in detail in my book, we can establish a very close parallelism between the catholic religion and modern medicine, although, for lack of space, I cannot go into all the details of each comparison in this article. In brief:

- physicians have taken the place of priests;

- vaccination plays the same initiatory role as baptism, and is accompanied by the same threats and fears;

- the search for health has replaced the quest for salvation;

- the fight against disease has replaced the fight against sin;

- eradication of viruses has taken the place of exorcising demons;

- the hope of physical immortality (cloning, genetic engineering) has been substituted for the hope of eternal life;

- pills have replaced the sacrament of bread and wine;

- donations to cancer research take precedence over donations to the church;

- a hypothetical universal vaccine could save humanity from all its illnesses, as the Saviour has saved the world from all its sins;

- the medical power has become the government’s ally, as was the Catholic Church in the past;

- "charlatans” are persecuted today as "heretics” were yesterday;

- dogmatism rules out promising alternative medical theories;

- the same absence of individual responsibility is now found in medicine, as previously in the Christian religion;

- patients are alienated from their bodies, as sinners used to be from their souls.

Wednesday, 14 April 2010

The meaning of the Word

The earth, the sky, the sea..

the bird, the ant, the you, the me...

the rock, the fruit, the tree..

it's all God....

it's called to Be.


PHOTOGRAPHY:Roslyn Ross.


I use the word Spiritual a lot.


I define myself as seeking to live a spiritual life.


Spiritual is the word which most seems to reflect my eclectic set of beliefs and philosophy of life.


It's a word which expresses the sacred without being religious. By that I mean a life where I have a lot of time for God and little or no time for religion.


Religion can of course be spiritual but often it is not. And spirituality can be religious but it does not need to be.


For me reacting to life from a spiritual perspective means that I see everything, and I mean everything, as having purpose and meaning as part of my spiritual growth. Nothing happens by chance and good can come out of everything. It is of course far more complex than that. And yet, at the same time, incredibly simple.

Having explored many religions in my life I finally decided to stick with God and stay away from religion. Hence I began to use the word spiritual a lot. So what do I mean? I have started to ask myself that question.

We need to understand what we mean when we use words to describe who we are or how we live. We need to understand what we are saying for our own sake. Dictionary definitions tend to link the religious with the spiritual and that is understandable but they can be, and often are, separate things. A Catholic priest, a wise and sensible man, said to me many years ago that there was nothing wrong with throwing away one's religion but unfortunately many people threw away their spirituality as well. His view was that one needed to discard the religion of childhood in order to return to it as an adult but that it was perfectly possible to reject religion and remain a spiritual being.

I thought about that for a long time and I did try to 'pick up' religion as an adult but, perhaps because I am a woman, there were just too many things I 'had to believe' ... in fact which I had to categorically state I believed ... which I knew I could, or would, never say.

I had enough trouble with the Lord's Prayer and always converted Father to Mother while wishing there was a gender neutral version. The problem with religion, despite the fact that within all of those I explored, it was clear there was a sound and beautiful spiritual foundation, was the overlay of misogyny and patriarchal prejudice. The closest I could come to a structure was the old Goddess religion, or Wiccan in it's modern form, but even that is a structure which defines God as feminine when any God worth having must be all; must be both masculine and feminine and neither.

And that left me with the spiritual which also has its complexities. For some spiritual 'means' ghostly visions; unexpected tappings and movements of furniture; inexplicable happenings ... and of course, spiritual encompasses all of those things. But such 'events' are the results or the manifestations of spiritual energies, not the substance of spiritual nor truly important in a spiritual life. Such things are often distractions from the real work of a Spiritual Life. Interesting distractions, and distractions worth understanding as much as one can, but distractions all the same.

At least for me. Everyone is different, every journey is different, every Soul is unique and that is why each and every spiritual journey is unique. We may learn from the experiences of others but we must always walk the spiritual path alone. Perhaps that is why spirituality and religion make such odd bed-fellows. A religious life demands that we obey rules, that we believe what others tell us, that we conform. While a spiritual life demands that we live by our own inner rules; that we question everything we are told by others and that we are guided by our own truth... a truth which emerges from our intuitive relationship with God.

With religion God is given to us - handed out on a patriarchal platter in the main. With a spiritual life we are called to search for God in every moment of our being. Religion hands God out in defined shapes and forms; spirituality offers God without shape or form.

A religious life is bounded and hounded by rules; a spiritual life has no boundaries and no urgency. A religious God is made in the image of man (mostly men with female support staff) while a spiritual God is in any and every image and yet without image for it is the source and being of all things.

It's interesting trying to define what one means by the use of a word and it makes me realise how inadequate words are to describe such things. No wonder the ancients decided that God was beyond words.

Carl Jung said, 'symbol is the lost language of the Soul,' and the spiritual journey is always symbolic. Within those images we find God without turning God into an image. It is not an easy journey because so much of it is solitary and their are no rules, except for the ones that you discover upon the way. But within that place of terror where you realise that at the end of the day, it is between you and God and your job is to do the hard work, there is freedom. When you depend upon others and the beliefs of others you remain dependent; when you depend upon yourself and your relationship with God, only then are you truly free.

And the beauty of the spiritual path is that you can find God in your own way. It requires a commitment to walk with open eyes ... most of the time anyway ... and to remain open to all that is, knowing that within any 'death' there is always 'rebirth.'

And there will be many 'deaths' along the path. It can be no other way. And that is why so few choose to walk the Spiritual Path for, as W.H. Auden so succintly wrote:

We would rather be ruined than changed.

We would rather die in our dread

than climb the cross of the moment

and let our illusions die.

This is actually the only quote I remember and I am sure there is a reason for that as well. Perhaps as a reminder of how hard it is to let our illusions die. And the most powerful illusion that we have and which most of us refuse to let die, is certainty. For it is such a comfortable illusion that we never cease striving to attain it. But illusion it is.

There is nothing wrong with thinking positive thoughts as opposed to negative thoughts - in fact it is wiser and more sensible to choose the positive - and we do have a choice. There is nothing wrong with setting goals and deciding what we want to achieve, whether it be physical, material, emotional, psychological or spiritual. There is nothing wrong with planning, wishing, wanting, pursueing ... desire is in fact an inherent and vital part of our human nature. Without 'desire' the human race would not survive. It is 'desire' which creates - whether the creation be life, love, food, nature, gardens, machines, sporting achievements, science, books, art or a better world. Before the creation of anything at all comes 'desire.'

When the Buddha warned against 'desire' he meant not a 'desire to bring forth' which is what we all do in every moment of our lives, but 'desire as demand.' When our desire becomes a demand we create unhappiness because we limit the expression of ourselves and our lives in the manifestation of that particular desire. When we need to 'have' something, as opposed to merely wanting or desiring we seek to control the creative process. Artists and athletes in particular know how important it is to train and prepare and then to let go. They may visualize an outcome, they may 'create' the desired result in their minds over and over again, but as soon as they begin to 'demand' the outcome they will put limitations not only on how the goal may be achieved, but if it will be achieved.

Letting go is very hard to do but it is the only way that we allow ourselves to be a part of the creative process and therefore open ourselves to all that may be possible and sometimes, miracles beyond imagining. It is within uncertainty that things are more easily born. The more you can live with uncertainty the more your life will flow. It may not go in the direction you expected but you will have a greater chance of reaching your goals and seeing your wishes realised than if you were demanding to be always in control.

We live in an ocean of energy and  we get where we want to go by understanding, respecting and working with that energy. In the same way that planes stay up in the air and fly safely around the world and ships sail across endless oceans because they work with the energetic environment in which they operate rather than demanding the environment obeys their commands. Some things are bigger than us and we come to grief when we fail to understand not only how this world works, but more importantly, how we work in this world.

The only thing which you will ever be able to control, albeit to varying degrees depending upon natures, is yourself. Life in all of its manifestations will continue to be unpredictable and uncertain but the better you understand and know yourself, the better you will be able to exert some control over your life.

Mastery is actually a better word than control. When we master something we learn a skill which we can then put into practice both consciously and unconsciously. Whether it is playing a sport or playing a piano we need to master the skill and then, if we are to do our very best, let go and 'allow' that skill to be as much expressed through us as by us. And for that to happen we must accept that certainly is only ever an illusion.

Living with uncertainty is the First Lesson on the Spiritual Path.